Network automation promises efficiency, cost savings, and innovation — but only if it’s executed properly. Without a clear strategy, proper metrics, and governance, automation can do more harm than good. From compliance violations to costly downtime, the risks of poorly managed automation are real and often underestimated.
This is the third post in our series on driving business value through network automation. In our first blog, we explored why aligning network automation with business goals is essential for achieving meaningful outcomes. Blog 2 delved into how to measure the ROI of automation, moving beyond cost savings to quantify broader business impacts.
Now, we’ll uncover the hidden risks of network automation and show you how to avoid them. We’ll also highlight some of the invisible issues that could be quietly sabotaging your automation goals, drawing from insights shared in Itential’s guide on overcoming automation blockers.
Many organizations rush into automation, believing that more automation equals better performance. But automating inefficient processes or scaling without governance and best practices can lead to bigger problems fast.
Example: A company automates a process that allows users to manually enter required data when requesting the automation, allowing for manual errors and missing key data validation. This scales errors across the entire network.
Sometimes, the most dangerous risks aren’t the obvious ones. As I outlined in a previous blog, Shining a Light on the Invisible Issues Blocking Your Automation Goals, these subtle pitfalls can quietly derail even the most promising automation initiatives:
Without a unified source of truth, teams struggle to manage devices consistently. Relying on disparate tools like NetBox, CMDBs, or even error-prone spreadsheets can introduce inconsistencies that hinder automation.
Just as people have different writing styles, teams may configure systems in varied ways, leading to unpredictable outcomes. Lack of standardization can create friction and errors in automated processes.
Organizational silos and resistance from key stakeholders (we all know a “Joe”) can block progress. Without alignment and cooperation, automation projects can stall or fail.
To mitigate these risks, organizations need a structured approach to automation:
Network automation can be a game-changer, but without the right strategy, metrics, and governance, it can introduce more problems than it solves. By understanding the hidden risks — both obvious and invisible — and applying a structured approach to mitigation, you can ensure your automation efforts deliver value without the unintended consequences.
Want to ensure your automation initiatives are set up for success? Check out our white paper, Aligning Automation to Business Value: A Framework for Metrics-Driven Impact, to learn how to avoid these pitfalls and maximize the value of your automation strategy.
You can also catch my live webinar on May 21st for an in-depth look at clearing the invisible roadblocks that prevent automation success — info and registration here.
See how Itential connects AI reasoning to governed execution across your entire infrastructure.